Claude Agent Teams: Why AI Coding Is About to Feel Like Managing a Real Engineering Squad

Building multi-agent coding systems that plan, review, and ship like real engineers

most people still use AI coding tools like this:

One long prompt.
One giant conversation.
One “super engineer” doing everything.

Backend, frontend, tests, refactors, docs - all crammed into a single context window.

it works… until it doesn’t. because this approach is prone to failure.

• context spills.

• decisions get forgotten.

• you end up re-explaining things the model already “knew”.

while researching Claude Code deeply over the last weeks, one thing became very clear to me:

the problem isn’t prompt quality. the problem is organizational structure.

and that’s exactly what Claude Agent Teams introduced just now 🔥

helpful links to places I sourced my info from:

• https://code.claude.com/docs/en/agent-teams

• https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1qz8tyy/how_to_set_up_claude_code_agent_teams_full/

---

The Big Mental Shift: From Prompting to Orchestration

we usually ask:

“How do I make the AI smarter?”

Claude Agent Teams nudges you toward a better question:

“How do I structure the work so intelligence compounds instead of collapsing?”

in real software companies, they don’t hire one engineer to:

• design the system

• write backend and frontend

• test everything

• coordinate changes

well, in some they do 😅.. but that’s needer sustainable or okay

so to tackle that (or what 99% of companies still do).. they have teams with roles.

Claude Agent Teams applies that exact idea to AI coding.

---

Think in Salaries, Not Tokens 💰

here’s the analogy that made everything click (and engaging 😄) for me .

p.s. i bet after some more years, tokens for these agent teams would cost more than hiring actual devs 👀

now, imagine a small product squad:

• Team lead / Architect – ~€160k
  - breaks down work, coordinates, reviews decisions

• Backend Engineer – ~€120k
  - APIs, DB models, business logic

• Frontend Dev – ~€100k
  - UI, state management, UX flows

• QA – ~€90k
  - test suites, regressions, edge cases

Claude Agent Teams maps shockingly well onto this model:

• The lead runs on a stronger (more expensive) model (sonner/opus?)

• Teammates run on cheaper, focused models (haiku?)

• work is tracked via a shared task board (like Jira/Linear..)

• communication happens via inboxes (like in Slack)

instead of paying one “super AI” to do everything sequentially, you build a balanced AI org. 👇

✔️ same budget
✔️ higher throughput
✔️ less context switching

---

What Claude Agent Teams Actually Are

Claude Agent Teams is the newest feature in Claude Code that allows multiple Claude agents to collaborate on the same project

each team has:

• A team lead
  Your main Claude Code session. It spawns agents, assigns tasks, and synthesizes results.

• Teammates
  Independent Claude Code sessions with their own context windows and role-specific instructions.

• A shared task list
  A file-backed task board with task states and dependencies.

• A mailbox system
  Agents send each other structured messages by appending JSON to inbox files.

you’re not “chatting harder”. you’re designing a system.

---

Copy-Paste: Spawning Your First Team

here’s a minimal but powerful Claude Code prompt you can literally paste:

Claude will:

• Spawn independent agents

• Create a shared task list

• Start coordination between roles

at this point, your job shifts from prompting to orchestrating

---

Under the Hood: Why This Feels Like a Real Team

Claude Agent Teams are file-backed:

• sending a message = appending JSON to an inbox

• claiming a task = updating a task file

• the lead’s inbox becomes a full audit log

this is AI collaboration designed like software, not chat 🚀

---

Agent Teams vs Subagents

Claude already had subagents - these are different.

Subagents

• Run inside one session

• Don’t talk to each other

• Great for one-off tasks

• Cheap and fast

Agent Teams

• Each agent is a full session

• Agents message each other directly

• Designed for interdependent work

• More expensive, much faster end-to-end

Subagents are function calls. Agent Teams are organizations.

---

Example: Shipping SSO Authentication

an example Claude Code prompt:

What’s powerful here isn’t speed alone, it’s early alignment.

👉 Backend and frontend negotiate interfaces before code solidifies.
👉 QA raises edge cases before merge.
👉 The lead resolves conflicts at the system level.

---

Delegate Mode: Think Like an EM

one feature that stood out strongly during research is delegate mode.

here is an example prompt:

this forces a clean separation:

• you design and review

• agents implement

It’s a subtle shift, but it pushes you into the right mental model:
AI as engineers, not magic.

---

When Agent Teams Make Sense

they’re great fits for:

• multi-layer features

• large refactors

• parallel research + implementation

• design debates

and they’re bad fits for:

• small, isolated tasks

• simple code generation

• extreme cost sensitivity

🚨 Docs and community reports consistently note:

A team can cost ~3–4× the tokens of a single session 💰

---

some final thoughts..

this feature is brand new, so most people haven’t internalized what it enables yet.

but the direction is clear:

AI coding isn’t becoming about better prompts.
It’s becoming about better management.

if you learn to think in teams instead of prompts, you’ll be ahead of the curve. 🚀

---

follow me on LinkedIn @ Konstantin Borimechkov ❤️

thank you all for going through this blog-post and I hope it really gave you some value and food for thought next time you develop build software using AI!

let’s crush this next week! 🚀